Daggerheart vs D&D: Comparison

Critical Role has taken an important step in the world of tabletop role-playing games with the release of Daggerheart. Although it shares certain foundations with Dungeons & Dragons (D&D), this fantasy RPG introduces innovative mechanics and a narrative-driven focus. While D&D balances combat, exploration, and social interaction, Daggerheart prioritizes player choices and the protagonists’ story, offering a different experience for players who are seeking deeper narrative immersion.

If you come from the world of D&D, it’s important to keep in mind that Daggerheart is not simply a clone of the classic game. There are significant differences in mechanics, conflict resolution, and storytelling approach. Below, we’ll explore the main divergences by comparing Daggerheart vs D&D to help you become familiar with this new role-playing system.

Dice System and the Roles of Fear and Hope

One of the biggest differences that appear when comparing Daggerheart vs D&D is the dice system. Both resolve actions through dice rolls, adding a character modifier.

In D&D, dice rolls determine successes or failures in actions such as attacks, spellcasting, or maneuvers. The d20 is the foundation of the system: a higher number indicates a better outcome. For example, if your D&D character tries to jump over a wall, you roll a d20 and add your skill bonus, which could be in Athletics. There are also secondary dice (d4, d6, d8, d10, d12) used to calculate damage, magical effects, and other variables.

Daggerheart follows a similar principle but with a narrative twist that adds a risk-and-reward system. It uses two 12-sided dice: one represents Hope and the other Fear. Every significant character action is resolved by rolling both dice, combining the result to generate positive, negative, or mixed effects depending on the situation. After rolling both dice, it’s important to state which die rolled higher. If the Hope die shows 9 and the Fear die shows 4, the total is 13 with Hope.

Therefore, a single roll can have four possible results instead of the two (success or failure) used in D&D:

• Success with Hope. The players are trying to open a door, they succeed without issue, and enter an empty room.

• Success with Fear. They manage to open the door but enter a room where they encounter a guard.

• Failure with Hope. They don’t succeed in opening the door and must find another way in.

• Failure with Fear. They fail to open the door and are also detected by a guard.

Unlike D&D’s binary success/failure approach, Daggerheart turns every roll into a balance of fortune and misfortune, where even a failure can enrich the narrative and provide new opportunities for the Dungeon Master.

Species: Daggerheart vs D&D

In D&D, characters are chosen from fantasy species: humans, elves, dwarves, halflings, half-elves, and others. Each race grants bonuses to stats and special features, such as darkvision or racial abilities. These differences affect performance in combat, exploration, and magic.

In Daggerheart, species are known as “Ancestors.” While it includes the classics like humans and elves, it also adds new options such as fairies or clanks. Each Ancestor provides unique abilities and traits that influence a character’s capabilities in the game. In addition, players can combine different Ancestors to create characters with mixed lineages, reflecting a rich cultural and biological diversity. This flexibility allows for deeper customization and richer storytelling within the campaign.

Combat Initiative

When comparing Daggerheart vs D&D, it’s impossible not to mention the removal of combat initiative in the new RPG.

In D&D, initiative determines the order of action in combat. Each player and enemy rolls a d20, adding Dexterity modifiers. This establishes a clear and strategic turn order. Initiative is crucial in complex encounters and allows for team tactics.

Daggerheart has no traditional tactical combat. Conflicts are resolved narratively, and players can intervene whenever they want. Similarly, enemies don’t act in a set order, so the DM can have them respond at any time, usually when a player rolls with Fear or fails an action.

It’s also necessary to consider how distances are measured in combat to determine attack ranges. In D&D, distances are defined much more precisely than in Daggerheart.

In Dungeons & Dragons, distances are measured in feet or grid squares, making it easy to represent fights on a battle map. Each square equals 5 feet, and based on that, the most common attack and spell ranges are established:

• Melee: 5 feet (1 square). Typical reach of swords, axes, daggers…

• Close: up to 30 feet (6 squares). Normal movement per turn and basic spells.

• Medium range: between 60 and 120 feet (12–24 squares). Medium-range spells and weapons.

• Far: 150–300 feet (30–60 squares). Longbows, powerful spells.

• Very far: over 300 feet. Only specific spells or narrative scenes.

In Daggerheart, exact distances in feet aren’t measured; instead, narrative range categories are used:

• Melee: physical contact.

• Very close: about 5–10 feet, details are visible.

• Close: about 10–30 feet, clear shapes are visible.

• Far: 30–100 feet, silhouettes and general details are visible.

• Very far: 100–300 feet, only large forms are visible.

Anything beyond Very far is considered out of range. Exact distances are only guidelines; what matters is the narration, and the final decision on range belongs to the DM.

Stress Points: Daggerheart vs D&D

D&D does not have a formal stress system; characters manage their survival through hit points, spell slots, physical resources, and abilities, but there isn’t a specific meter that reflects how much emotional or psychological tension a character is building up. Some editions or optional rules include effects like fatigue, exhaustion, or “narrative stress,” but there’s no official numerical stress indicator showing when a PC is at an emotional breaking point beyond physical damage, conditions (like “stressed” or “exhausted”), and depleted resources. Still, many players use homebrew systems for this.

Daggerheart, on the other hand, introduces an explicit Stress Points mechanic that reflects the mental, emotional, and physical strain characters endure during the adventure. Every time a difficult encounter, narrative complication, or risky roll occurs, the game may require the player to “mark stress,” affecting future decisions and the storyline. It doesn’t just represent wear and tear, but can also have mechanical and narrative consequences: if a character fills all their stress slots, they can become vulnerable, since at that point stress points spill into hit point slots, reducing them.

In addition, stress points in Daggerheart aren’t only a negative counter: they also function as a currency for abilities or narrative trade-offs. Some moves (special player actions) require marking stress to achieve more impactful narrative effects. Stress can also be accumulated to swap domain cards between the loadout and the vault, adding a tactical and narrative layer to resource management.

Domains for Each Player

A major difference between Daggerheart vs D&D is the role of domains, since Daggerheart has redefined the term to give it an important role in gameplay.

In Dungeons & Dragons, domains are strongly tied to the cleric subclass and represent the thematic or philosophical spheres a deity can grant to its followers (for example, the Life domain, War domain, Magic domain, Light domain, Peace domain, etc.). Domains usually grant prepared spells or specific abilities that reflect the chosen divinity, and their use is closely tied to the classic structure of spellcasting, spell levels, and spiritual equipment.

By contrast, Daggerheart redefines the concept of “domain” as one of the two central components that build a character’s class during creation and progression. Each class combines two domains chosen from nine available (for example, “Arcana” and “Sage” for the druid, “Blade” and “Bone” for the warrior, “Grace” and “Codex” for the bard).

Each domain comes with its own Domain Deck of cards containing abilities, spells, or passive effects that the character can select as they level up or when swapping cards in their loadout. Players can switch between active and inactive cards (loadout and vault), and some changes carry a narrative or mechanical cost in the form of marking stress (Recall Cost). This system allows for highly flexible, visual, and streamlined customization of character abilities, and encourages collaboration among players to avoid excessive overlap in domains or similar skills.

Skill System

When comparing Daggerheart vs D&D, it’s also essential to talk about the skill system, since both games handle it in very different ways.

In Dungeons & Dragons, the skill system relies on growing numerical values: characters choose skills or skill proficiencies, gain proficiency bonuses, improve with levels, can specialize in certain areas, and base their actions on dice rolls modified by these values. Over time, characters become more specialized and efficient in certain tasks, and progression is fairly structured and quantitative.

In Daggerheart, instead of traditional numerical skills, characters define their capabilities narratively through Experiences. When creating a character, the player chooses two experiences (a word or short phrase like “scholar,” “sticky fingers,” “battle hardened”) with the help of the Game Master. When a situation arises in which one of these experiences is relevant to the attempted task, the player can spend Hope with DM approval to gain a +2 modifier on the action roll.

This approach connects skills directly to the character’s story and identity instead of abstract stats. In Daggerheart, narrative decisions count just as much as “numerical skill,” and the use of the Experience system allows characters to be flexible, creative, and distinct from each other, without being limited by a character sheet with a fixed list of proficiencies and preset bonuses.

The Role of Story

In D&D, the story is guided by the Dungeon Master (DM), who presents scenarios, enemies, and challenges. Players influence the narrative through decisions, interactions, and exploration. Narrative and strategy are connected: defeating enemies or completing missions determines the progress of the story.

Daggerheart is a story-driven role-playing game, co-created by all players. The mechanics of Hope and Fear reflect how actions affect characters and the story, prioritizing emotional experience over strategy. Therefore, Dungeons & Dragons’ more balanced approach is one of the major differences in practice, along with the mechanics behind downtime actions, combat, elements, spells, and more.

To create an immersive experience, the game board is a key piece. There is a wide variety of fantasy furniture and scenery, such as DnD coins, dungeon tiles, and dungeon silicone molds to customize settings, along with countless bits to complement the environment (stairs, cauldrons, chests, cages, torches, candles, etc.).

Thus, when comparing Daggerheart vs D&D, we conclude that they both offer complete TTRPG experiences, but with different approaches. Both games share cooperation and collaborative storytelling, but they differ in how conflicts are resolved, how progress is measured, and how much weight is placed on narrative. The choice between the two depends on the type of experience the players are looking for: strategic and tactical in D&D, or emotional and narrative-driven in Daggerheart.

Legal Disclaimer

All trademarks, logos, and product names mentioned, including but not limited to Critical Role, Daggerheart, Dungeons & Dragons (D&D), and any other titles, are the property of their respective owners. The use of these names in this text is for informational and descriptive purposes only, with no intention of infringing on intellectual property rights, copyrights, or trademarks.

This content is not sponsored, authorized, endorsed, or affiliated with any of the owners of the aforementioned brands, nor does it imply any commercial relationship with them. Any reference is made solely to aid the reader's understanding within the context of informational content for miniature wargaming enthusiasts.

Furthermore, Green Stuff World is not associated, licensed, affiliated, or authorized by the creators or owners of Critical Role or any other brands mentioned. The mention of Green Stuff World is solely provided as an example of a general supplier of accessories and materials for modelling and wargames.

This text is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to substitute, replicate, or compete with the official products or services of any registered brand.